Why the study?
Does local (intravaginal or intrauterine) immunization with inactivated poliovaccine induce a local antibody response in the human female genital tract compared to systemic (intramuscular) immunization?
Does local (intravaginal or intrauterine) immunization with inactivated poliovaccine induce a local antibody response in the human female genital tract compared to systemic (intramuscular) immunization?
Local immunization in the female genital tract induces specific local secretory antibody responses, providing evidence for local synthesis of antibodies which may be relevant for preventing genital infections.
Local immunization induces genital secretory antibodies; leaves open whether this prevents genital infections or warrants clinical adoption.
Antibody response to poliovirus type I in serum, the nasopharynx, and the secretions of the genital tract was studied in human volunteers after intravaginal, intrauterine, nasopharyngeal, or intramuscular immunization with inactivated poliovaccine. The techniques of radioimmunodiffusion and autoradiography with P32 labeled poliovirus as the antigen were employed to determine antibody activity in the major classes of immunoglobulin in serum and secretions. Intravaginal and intrauterine immunization consistently resulted in the appearance of secretory antibody to poliovirus in the genital tract. The vaginal response was predominantly of γA immunoglobulin, while the response in the uterus was essentially limited to γG immunoglobulin. Intramuscular immunization resulted in a delayed appearance of γG response in the genital tract, which could be correlated with the highest γG antibody titers in the serum. No genital γA response was observed, however, after such immunization. These observations provide evidence for local synthesis of poliovirus antibody in the genital tract, and its implication may be applicable to other genital infections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogra et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: