Key result
In patients with Parkinson's disease, brachial and central blood pressure assessments showed low intrarater reliability and agreement between visits 1 and 2, but good reliability and agreement between visits 2 and 3.
Why the study?
The intrarater reliability and agreement of blood pressure, arterial stiffness, and heart rate variability assessments needed evaluation in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Observational (n=20)
Open-label
No
In Parkinson's disease patients, resting blood pressure assessments require at least one familiarization session to achieve reliable measurements, whereas arterial stiffness and most HRV indices show acceptable reliability across visits.
Acceptable reliability of these measures in PD supports repeated research assessments; leaves open clinical prognostic use.
To assess the intrarater reliability and agreement of blood pressure (BP), arterial stiffness, and heart rate variability (HRV) assessments in patients with Parkinson`s disease (PD). Twenty patients with PD visited the laboratory three times, during which brachial and central BP (auscultatory and applanation tonometry, respectively), arterial stiffness (carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and augmentation index), and HRV assessments were performed at rest. Brachial and central systolic BP presented greater values on visit 1 when compared to visits 2 and 3 (122±13 vs. 116±16 vs. 120±15, p=0.029). There were no significant differences (p>0.05) among the experimental visits for other parameters. Brachial and central BP showed an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) above 0.842 and a standard error of measurement (SEM) lower than 5.0%. Bland–Altman plots indicated low agreement between visits 1 and 2 and good agreement between visits 2 and 3. Arterial stiffness indices exhibited ICC values between 0.781 and 0.886, and SEM ranged from 7.3% to 25.2%. Bland–Altman plots indicated moderate to good agreement among visits for arterial stiffness parameters. HRV indices presented ICC values ranging from 0.558 to 0.854 and SEM values ranging from 5.1% to 76.0%. Bland–Altman plots indicated moderate agreement among visits for HRV parameters. In PD patients, brachial and central BP present low intrarater reliability and agreement between visits 1 and 2 and good intrarater reliability and agreement between visits 2 and 3. In general, arterial stiffness and HRV assessments present acceptable intrarater reliability and agreement among visits, except for cardiac sympathovagal balance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lima et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Parkinson's disease (n=20). Repeated cardiovascular assessments (blood pressure, arterial stiffness, heart rate variability) vs. Between-visit comparisons (Visit 1 vs 2 vs 3) was evaluated on Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for brachial systolic blood pressure across three visits (ICC 0.921, 95% CI 0.834-0.966, p=0.029). In patients with Parkinson's disease, brachial and central blood pressure assessments showed low intrarater reliability and agreement between visits 1 and 2, but good reliability and agreement between visits 2 and 3.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia