Key result
Poor households experienced lower absolute FMD financial losses (USD 436 vs USD 949) but a higher relative income impact (128% vs 49%) compared to well-off households (P<0.001).
Observational (n=124)
Absolute Event Rate: 436% vs 949%
p-value: p=< 0.001
FMD has a severe financial impact on poorer households, highlighting the need for prevention and biosecurity interventions.
FMD imposes higher relative financial burden on poor households; hypothesis-generating for equity-focused prevention pending longitudinal studies.
The socioeconomic impacts of foot and mouth disease (FMD) during 2011-12 outbreaks on large ruminant smallholders in Laos were investigated, including examination of data on gender, household financial status and farmer husbandry practices. A mix of participatory tools and survey questionnaires at the village and household level, respectively, were conducted, involving individual farmer interviews (n = 124) and group meetings with village elders to establish criteria for classification of household financial status as being 'poor, medium or well off' according to rice sufficiency, assets and household incomes. FMD-attributable financial losses were determined by inclusion of losses due to: mortality, morbidity and costs of treatments. The estimated mean financial losses due to FMD were USD 436 (±92) in the 'poor' and USD 949 (±76) in the 'well off' household categories (P < 0.001), being 128% and 49% of income from the sale of large ruminants, respectively. Variation in financial losses reflected differences in morbidity, farmer husbandry practices including frequency of observation of animals and thus recognition of FMD and choice of treatments. Of concern were adverse financial impacts of treatment especially where antibiotics were used; delays in reporting of FMD cases after observation of signs (mean of 2 days); admission that 10% of farmers had sold FMD-affected livestock; and that 22% of respondents claimed their large ruminants were cared for by females. The findings confirm that FMD has the most severe financial impact on poorer households and that females have a significant role in large ruminant production. It is recommended that livestock extension activities promote the benefits of prevention rather than treatment for FMD and encourage participation of women in biosecurity and disease risk management interventions including rapid reporting and regulatory compliance, particularly with animal movement controls and other biosecurity practices that reduce the negative impacts of FMD on regional food security and poverty reduction in rural communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nampanya et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Foot and mouth disease (n=124). Poor household financial status vs. Well off household financial status was evaluated on Mean financial losses due to FMD (USD) (p=< 0.001). Poor households experienced lower absolute FMD financial losses (USD 436 vs USD 949) but a higher relative income impact (128% vs 49%) compared to well-off households (P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: