Why the study?
Does the APACHE II scoring system correlate with 6-month survival in adult ICU patients?
Does the APACHE II scoring system correlate with 6-month survival in adult ICU patients?
Admission APACHE II scores correlate with 6-month survival in general ICU patients, and early score improvements reflect the benefit of intensive care.
May aid 6-month prognostication in adult ICU patients; leaves open whether serial scores should guide decisions.
In this paper we present a detailed analysis of the use of the APACHE II (acute physiological and chronic health evaluation) scoring system on all of the patients admitted to the general intensive care unit at the Bristol Royal Infirmary over a 20-month period. The 6-month survival of 691 adult medical and surgical patients following intensive care was recorded and this data was analysed with admission and daily APACHE II scores using a relational database. Our data confirms the relationship between admission APACHE II scores and outcome, with mean scores decreasing as duration of survival increases. We also demonstrate that the best day one scores are approximately 50% less than the admission score, irrespective of outcome, indicating the benefit of intensive care. By contrast, however, the scores on day one have either not improved or have worsened since admission, reflecting the importance of the pre-morbid health status of the patient in determining outcome from intensive care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campbell et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: