Key result
Genetic deletion of Gαi2 in adult mice increased basal and agonist-activated GIRK currents and shortened the effective refractory period compared to littermate controls.
Why the study?
Does genetic deletion of specific inhibitory G protein isoforms alter GIRK currents and atrial electrophysiology in murine atria?
Does genetic deletion of specific inhibitory G protein isoforms alter GIRK currents and atrial electrophysiology in murine atria?
Deletion of Gαi2 increases basal and agonist-activated GIRK currents and shortens the effective refractory period, suggesting a potentially proarrhythmic effect in the atria.
Gαi2 deletion increases murine atrial GIRK currents; leaves open isoform-specific regulation in human atrial electrophysiology.
G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K + (GIRK) channels are the major inwardly rectifying K + currents in cardiac atrial myocytes and an important determinant of atrial electrophysiology. Inhibitory G protein α-subunits can both mediate activation via acetylcholine but can also suppress basal currents in the absence of agonist. We studied this phenomenon using whole cell patch clamping in murine atria from mice with global genetic deletion of Gα i2 , combined deletion of Gα i1 /Gα i3 , and littermate controls. We found that mice with deletion of Gα i2 had increased basal and agonist-activated currents, particularly in the right atria while in contrast those with Gα i1 /Gα i3 deletion had reduced currents. Mice with global genetic deletion of Gα i2 had decreased action potential duration. Tissue preparations of the left atria studied with a multielectrode array from Gα i2 knockout mice showed a shorter effective refractory period, with no change in conduction velocity, than littermate controls. Transcriptional studies revealed increased expression of GIRK channel subunit genes in Gα i2 knockout mice. Thus different G protein isoforms have differential effects on GIRK channel behavior and paradoxically Gα i2 act to increase basal and agonist-activated GIRK currents. Deletion of Gα i2 is potentially proarrhythmic in the atria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nobles et al. (2018) studied this question. Genetic deletion of Gαi2 or Gαi1/Gαi3 vs. Littermate controls was evaluated on GIRK channel basal and agonist-activated currents, action potential duration, and effective refractory period. Genetic deletion of Gαi2 in adult mice increased basal and agonist-activated GIRK currents and shortened the effective refractory period compared to littermate controls.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: