Key result
High-frame-rate diverging-wave echocardiography successfully tracked myocardium and vortex flow dynamics, with clinical diastolic indices correlating well with conventional ultrasound (r2=0.96).
Why the study?
Does high-frame-rate diverging-wave echocardiography accurately measure clinical diastolic indices compared to conventional ultrasound in healthy volunteers?
Observational (n=12)
Does high-frame-rate diverging-wave echocardiography accurately measure clinical diastolic indices compared to conventional ultrasound in healthy volunteers?
Effect estimate: r2= 0.96
High-frame-rate Doppler echocardiography enables simultaneous tracking of myocardium and vortex flow dynamics within a single cardiac cycle, showing excellent correlation with conventional diastolic indices.
May refine diastolic assessment in practice; extends high-frame-rate imaging but leaves clinical adoption open pending validation.
Echocardiography is widely used to provide critical left ventricular indices describing myocardial motion and blood inflow velocity. Tissue motion and blood flow are strongly connected and interdependent in the ventricle. During cardiac relaxation, rapid filling leads to the formation of a vortical blood flow pattern. In this paper, we introduce a high-frame-rate method to track vortex dynamics alongside myocardium motion, in a single heartbeat. Cardiac triplex imaging (B-mode + tissue Doppler + color Doppler) was obtained by insonating the left ventricle with diverging waves. We used coherent compounding with integrated motion compensation to obtain high-quality B-mode images. Tissue Doppler was retrieved and the septal and lateral velocities of the mitral annulus were deduced. A rate of ~80 triplex images/s was obtained. Vortex dynamics was analyzed by Doppler vortography. Blood vortex signature maps were used to track the vortex and compute core vorticities. The sequence was implemented in a Verasonics scanner with a 2.5-MHz phased array and tested in vivo in 12 healthy volunteers. Two main peaks appeared on the vorticity curves. These peaks were synchronized with the mitral inflow velocities with a small delay. We observed a relationship between the tissue and vortex waveforms, though also with a delay, which denoted the lag between the wall and the flow motion. Clinical diastolic indices combining basal and mitral inflow velocities (E/A ratio and E/e' ratio) were determined and compared with those measured using a conventional ultrasound scanner; a good correlation was obtained (r2= 0.96). High-frame-rate Doppler echocardiography enabled us to retrieve time-resolved dynamics of the myocardium and vortex flow within the same cardiac cycle. Coupling wall-flow analysis could be of clinical relevance for early diagnosis of filling impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Faurie et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=12). High-frame-rate diverging-wave echocardiography vs. Conventional ultrasound scanner was evaluated on Correlation of clinical diastolic indices (E/A ratio and E/e' ratio) with conventional ultrasound (r2= 0.96). High-frame-rate diverging-wave echocardiography successfully tracked myocardium and vortex flow dynamics, with clinical diastolic indices correlating well with conventional ultrasound (r2=0.96).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: