Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Conical light pipes to condense radiation are attractive in their simplicity and low cost.In addition, when using detectors having non-uniform surface response, the non-image forming characteristics of such channels are desirable. Through the use of a field lens, channels may be designed which condense the radiation through a given area to the smallest possible size. As viewed from the output end of the channel, this corresponds to achievement of the optimum f/number of 0.6. Reflection losses in the experimental model described increased the f/number to 0.77. The cone channel described has the further advantage that it is not receptive to stray light.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. E. Williamson (1952) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: