Why the study?
Is increased arterial stiffness associated with electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial remodeling in a general population of 65-year-olds?
Is increased arterial stiffness associated with electrocardiographic criteria of left ventricular hypertrophy and left atrial remodeling in a general population of 65-year-olds?
Increased arterial stiffness is associated with a doubled risk of electrocardiographic LVH and atrial remodeling in 65-year-olds, independent of 24-hour blood pressure.
Should not yet change practice in 65-year-olds; leaves open prospective validation of arterial stiffness for ECG risk stratification.
INTRODUCTION: Stiffness of the large arteries plays a role in the development of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), although there are few data on this relation in the general population. The cohort of the Prognostic Indicator of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events study is a representative population of 65-year-old individuals in which this relation can be examined. METHOD: To evaluate arterial stiffness, we used the ambulatory measure of the QKD interval that enables calculation of an isobaric index of arterial stiffness, QKD100-60. We analyzed its relationship with electrocardiographic criteria of LVH and left atrial remodeling on 775 individuals in the Prognostic Indicator of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events cohort. RESULTS: We demonstrated a significant relationship between arterial stiffness and prevalence of electrocardiographically determined LVH and atrial remodeling, independent of 24-h blood pressure. Individuals belonging to the highest quartile of arterial stiffness (QKD100-60 <195 ms) had double the risk of ECG anomalies. CONCLUSION: This study is further support of a link between arterial stiffness and the risk of LVH or atrial remodeling in the general population. This risk is independent of age and 24-h blood pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gosse et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: