Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To determine the rate of inappropriate use of the ambulance service a prospective study of patients brought to a Dublin accident and emergency (A&E) department by ambulance was performed over a 78-day period—358 cases were analysed representing 37% of the ambulance case load. The receiving A&E physician deemed 43.3% of cases to have a definite indication for calling an ambulance, 36.9% a relative indication and 19.8% to have no indication. A strong correlation was shown between a definite indication for transport by ambulance and admission to hospital. Acute medical illness was the most common presentation in the study group (45.8%). Patients themselves were predominant in calling for a 999 ambulance and 35.8% were deemed to have no indication for doing so. When a general practitioner requests the ambulance only 7.4% of cases had no indication for the action. Approximately one-third (31%) of 999 calls were made because the patient had no transport alternative. The problem of ambulance misuse is multifactorial and a variety of strategies are required to address the issue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LITTLE et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: