Why the study?
Does ANG II and ANG-(1-7) regulate ACE2 expression in neonatal rat astrocytes?
Does ANG II and ANG-(1-7) regulate ACE2 expression in neonatal rat astrocytes?
ANG II downregulates ACE2 expression via AT1 receptors in rat astrocytes, a process that is modulated by ANG-(1-7), suggesting a complex feed-forward regulatory system in the brain.
Astrocytic ACE2 downregulation by ANG II warrants no clinical change; leaves open a brain-specific feed-forward RAS loop for further study.
Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a homolog of ACE that preferentially forms angiotensin-(1-7) [ANG-(1-7)] from angiotensin II (ANG II). Incubation of neonatal rat cerebellar or medullary astrocytes with ANG II reduced ACE2 mRNA by approximately 60%, suggesting transcriptional regulation of the enzyme. In contrast, ANG II had no effect on ACE mRNA in astrocytes isolated from either brain region, demonstrating a differential regulation of the two enzymes by ANG II. The ANG II-mediated reduction in ACE2 mRNA was blocked by the angiotensin type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonists losartan or valsartan; the angiotensin type 2 (AT(2)) antagonist PD123319 was ineffective. The reduction in ACE2 mRNA by ANG II also was associated with a 50% decrease in cerebellar and medullary ACE2 protein, which was blocked by losartan. Treatment of medullary astrocytes with ANG-(1-7), the product of ACE2 hydrolysis of ANG II, did not affect ACE2 mRNA; however, ANG-(1-7) prevented the ANG II-mediated reduction in ACE2 mRNA. The addition of [d-Ala(7)]-ANG-(1-7), a selective AT((1-7)) receptor antagonist, blocked the inhibitory actions of ANG-(1-7). These data are the first to demonstrate transcriptional regulation of ACE2 by ANG II and ANG-(1-7). Because ACE2 preferentially converts ANG II to ANG-(1-7), downregulation of the enzyme by ANG II constitutes a novel positive feed-forward system within the brain that may favor ANG II-mediated neural responses. Furthermore, the modulatory role of ANG-(1-7) in the transcriptional regulation of ACE2 by ANG II suggests a complex interplay between these peptides that is mediated by distinct receptor systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallagher et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: