Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: This study examined health-related quality of life in a general population in relation to different socioeconomic variables. Method: The study was cross-sectional and was conducted in Uppsala county, Sweden, which had approximately 290,000 inhabitants In 1995. The study was based on a self-administered postal questionnaire sent to a random sample of 8,000 inhabitants aged 20-84 years, with a response rate of 68%. Health-related quality of life was measured on a 0 (dead) to 1 (full health) cardinal scale by two methods used to measure health-state utilities In economic evaluations, i.e. the rating scale method and the time trade-off method. Results: The mean age was 46 years and approximately 54% were women. Almost 70% were married or cohabrtors. Approxiamtely 33% of the respondents had less than high-school education and 26% had a university degree. The mean income was SEK 13,000 per month and the proportion unemployed was 4.5%. The proportions of blue-collar workers, white-collar workers and self-employed were 40, 50 and 10% respectively. With the rating scale method, the mean health-state utility decreased from 0.86 in the youngest age group (20-29 years) to 0.63 (80- years) in the oldest age group and from 0.94 to 0.61 with the time trade-off method. Quality of life increased with income, education and social group and decreased with being single and unemployed. Conclusion: These methods are useful In assessing hearth-related quality of life in the general population and that quality of life varies substantially among different sodoeconomic groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lena Lundberg (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: