Why the study?
Does a time growing neural network improve the classification of systolic ejection clicks in children compared to other neural network models?
Does a time growing neural network improve the classification of systolic ejection clicks in children compared to other neural network models?
The time growing neural network (TGNN) demonstrates superior classification rate and sensitivity for detecting systolic ejection clicks in children compared to traditional neural network models.
TGNN may aid pediatric click detection; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
In this paper, we present a novel neural network for classification of short-duration heart sounds: the time growing neural network (TGNN). The input to the network is the spectral power in adjacent frequency bands as computed in time windows of growing length. Children with heart systolic ejection click (SEC) and normal children are the two groups subjected to analysis. The performance of the TGNN is compared to that of a time delay neural network (TDNN) and a multi-layer perceptron (MLP), using training and test datasets of similar sizes with a total of 614 normal and abnormal cardiac cycles. From the test dataset, the classification rate/sensitivity is found to be 97.0%/98.1% for the TGNN, 85.1%/76.4% for the TDNN, and 92.7%/85.7% for the MLP. The results show that the TGNN performs better than do TDNN and MLP when frequency band power is used as classifier input. The performance of TGNN is also found to exhibit better immunity to noise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gharehbaghi et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: