Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: The role of granulocyte transfusions (GT) in patients with neutropenia-related infections remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 47 neutropenic patients, treated with 348 consecutive GTs for life-threatening infections between 1999 and 2004, is presented. RESULTS: The only grade III-IV toxicity observed in GT recipients was respiratory deterioration (n = 6, 12.8%). The overall infection-related mortality (IRM) approached 38%. Achievement of a neutrophil count of > 700 cells per microl after at least 50% of days of GTs (n = 33, 70%) significantly correlated with reduced IRM (27.3% vs. 64.3%, P < 0.02). GT doses of > 2 x 10(10) neutrophils per bag appeared to increase both neutophil and platelet counts following transfusion. CONCLUSION: GTs are safe and should be considered for patients with life-threatening neutropenic infections. However, prospective randomized studies of GTs are the only way to establish the true role of GTs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ofran et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: