Why the study?
Does low-molecular-weight heparin improve the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and reduce complications compared to unfractionated heparin?
Does low-molecular-weight heparin improve the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism and reduce complications compared to unfractionated heparin?
Low-molecular-weight heparin is emerging as a preferred alternative to unfractionated heparin for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism.
Intravenous heparin followed by warfarin has been the classical anticoagulant therapy of acute venous thromboembolism for the last 30 years. Furthermore, low-dose unfractionated heparin given two to three times daily has been the most popular form of prophylaxis for venous thrombosis. In recent years, a number of low-molecular-weight heparins have become available for clinical trials. These agents have many advantages over unfractionated heparin and are now being used widely internationally for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Indeed, low-molecular-weight heparin will undoubtedly replace intravenous unfractionated heparin not only in the treatment of venous thromboembolism, but in other conditions where heparin therapy is indicated. Whether or not the low-molecular-weight heparins can decrease or eliminate some of the complications of unfractionated heparin will depend on the outcome of future clinical trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pineo et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: