Why the study?
Does hypobaric spinal anaesthesia reduce the incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis compared to general anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement?
Does hypobaric spinal anaesthesia reduce the incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis compared to general anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective total hip replacement?
Spinal anaesthesia significantly reduces the risk of postoperative deep vein thrombosis compared to general anaesthesia in patients undergoing total hip replacement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports preferring spinal over general anesthesia for hip replacement; confirms DVT reduction in this RCT.
The effect of hypobaric spinal anaesthesia or narcotic-halothane-relaxant general anaesthesia on the incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis was studied in 140 elective total hip replacements in a prospective randomised manner. Deep vein thrombosis was diagnosed using impedance plethysmography and the 125I fibrinogen uptake test, combined, in selected cases, with ascending contrast venography. The overall incidence of deep vein thrombosis was 20%. Nine patients (13%) developed deep vein thrombosis in the spinal group and nineteen (27%) in the general anaesthetic group (p less than 0.05). The incidences of proximal thrombosis and of bilateral thrombi were also less with spinal anaesthesia than with general anaesthesia. It is concluded that spinal anaesthesia reduces the risks of postoperative thromboembolism in hip replacement surgery. The presence of varicose veins, being a non-smoker and having a low body mass index were associated with an increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: