Why the study?
Does spinal anaesthesia alter calf blood flow compared to general anaesthesia in patients undergoing total hip replacement?
Does spinal anaesthesia alter calf blood flow compared to general anaesthesia in patients undergoing total hip replacement?
Spinal anaesthesia maintains elevated calf blood flow in the non-surgical leg during total hip replacement compared to general anaesthesia, though its impact on postoperative deep vein thrombosis remains unclear.
Spinal anaesthesia sustains elevated non-surgical leg blood flow versus general anaesthesia; extends haemodynamic data but leaves postoperative DVT effects unresolved.
Calf blood flow was studied using venous occlusion impedance plethysmography during 122 total hip arthroplasties. Patients were randomly allocated to receive spinal or general anaesthesia. Blood flow was measured nine times perioperatively. In the non-surgical leg, mean blood flow rose by over 50% in both groups following anaesthetic induction, remaining significantly elevated with spinal but falling back gradually to baseline with general anaesthesia. In the surgical leg, surgical manipulations produced marked falls in flow in many patients, particularly with femoral component insertion. If this occurred, hyperaemia was commonly seen with spinal anaesthesia but rarely with general anaesthesia once the joint was relocated. Venous outflow resistance rose slightly during anaesthesia in both groups, more so with general anaesthesia. In the surgical leg, marked rises occurred with surgical manipulations, but resistance fell abruptly once the joint was relocated. No clear relationship between these observations and the occurrence of deep vein thrombosis postoperatively was established.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: