During a 19-month period from April 1993 to October 1994, 41 isolates of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) were detected in seven different hospitals in a city in southern Texas. A case-control study to determine the risk factors for acquisition was done in the hospital in which the majority of isolates were detected. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of whole-cell DNA was used to determine strain identity. Thirty-five (85%) of the 41 VREF isolates were of the vanB phenotype. Of these, 32 (91%) of 35 were the same strain by PFGE typing. The same vanB strain was documented in five different hospitals in the city. In contrast, 4 (67%) of 6 of the vanA phenotype VREF isolates were distinct strains by PFGE typing. Significant risk factors for colonization or infection with VREF were prior exposure to antibiotics (P = .04), the previous use of third-generation cephalosporins (P = .03), and the previous use of parenteral vancomycin (P = .002). Infection-control and antibiotic-utilization measures were implemented to control cross-transmission and selection of VREF isolates. During the emergence of VREF in our city, clonal dissemination of a single strain of vanB VREF among six hospitals was documented. Limited cross-transmission of vanA phenotype VREF isolates occurred, but most vanA VREF isolates were distinct strains selected in individual hospital environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moreno et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: