Why the study?
A major issue of cardiac implantable electronic device therapy in pediatric patients is the high incidence of lead dysfunctions and associated reinterventions.
What is the incidence and mode of detection of lead and generator dysfunction in pediatric patients with epicardial pacemakers or ICDs?
What is the incidence and mode of detection of lead and generator dysfunction in pediatric patients with epicardial pacemakers or ICDs?
Lead and generator dysfunctions are common in pediatric patients with epicardial devices and are mostly detected by device interrogation rather than symptoms, highlighting the need for close monitoring.
May inform intensified surveillance protocols in pediatric epicardial CIED recipients; leaves open optimal device selection and intervention timing.
BACKGROUND: A major issue of cardiac implantable electronic device therapy in pediatric patients is the high incidence of lead dysfunctions and associated reinterventions. This study aims to analyze the timing and mode of generator and lead dysfunction. METHODS: Retrospective single-center analysis of 283 children and young adults with an epicardial pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy from 1998 to 2018. RESULTS: Mean age at implant was 6.1 years (SD ± 5.8 years) and median follow-up 6.4 years (IQR, 3.4-10.4 years) with a total of 1998.1 patient-years of cardiac device therapy. A total of 120 lead-related complications were observed in 82 patients (29.0%). They were detected by device interrogation (n = 86), symptoms (n = 13), intraoperative findings (n = 7), routine chest radiography (n = 5), routine ECG (n = 4), patient alert sound by device (n = 3), and physical examination (n = 2). It was possible to find the date of the event on the device memory in 21 out of 120 lead dysfunctions (18%) with a median time interval between occurrence and detection of 1.3 months (IQR, 0.2-5.0 months). Moreover, 20 generator-related complications were found in 13 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Early recognition of lead and generator dysfunction remains challenging in pediatric patients. As symptoms are relatively rare conditions in the context of PM and ICD dysfunction, close patient monitoring is mandatory, even in asymptomatic patients with a good clinical course. To further improve the safety of pediatric pacing systems, more durable epicardial electrodes are desirable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winkler et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: