Why the study?
Does the plasma acylcarnitine to free carnitine ratio predict adverse prognosis in patients with heart failure?
Does the plasma acylcarnitine to free carnitine ratio predict adverse prognosis in patients with heart failure?
An elevated plasma acylcarnitine to free carnitine ratio is a significant predictor of adverse cardiac events in patients with HFpEF, but not HFrEF.
AC/FC ratio may refine HF risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
AIMS: The failing heart is accompanied by disturbed energy metabolism with mitochondrial dysfunction. Carnitine transports fatty acids into mitochondria for β-oxidation. Decreased myocardial carnitine levels accompanied by increased plasma carnitine levels in heart failure (HF) have been reported. The plasma acylcarnitine to free carnitine ratio (AC/FC) is recognized as a marker of carnitine deficiency. We aimed to investigate the impact of the AC/FC on HF prognosis, taking into consideration differences between HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and those with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive 168 HF patients were divided into three groups based on their AC/FC: first to third tertiles (n = 56, respectively). We followed up all patients for cardiac events including cardiac death and/or worsening HF. During the follow-up period (1004 days), there were 23 cardiac deaths and 28 worsening HF. In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cardiac event rate of the third group was highest among the three groups (P = 0.022). In the Cox proportional hazard analysis, AC/FC was a predictor of cardiac events (P = 0.007). When HFpEF (n = 79) and HFrEF (n = 89) were analysed separately, the cardiac event rate of the third group was highest with regard to HFpEF (P = 0.008), but not HFrEF (P = 0.321). In the Cox proportional hazard analysis, AC/FC was a predictor of cardiac events with regard to HFpEF (P = 0.031), but not HFrEF (P = 0.095). Therefore, the impact of the AC/FC on cardiac events was different between HFpEF and HFrEF (P = 0.042 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS: The AC/FC can identify high risk HF patients, especially in HFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshihisa et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: