Why the study?
High sensitivity cardiac troponin assays suitable for small laboratories are desirable for rural testing, leading investigators to verify the analytical performance of the newly approved Quidel TriageTrue hs-cTnI assay against other assays.
Does the Quidel TriageTrue hs-cTnI assay have comparable analytical performance to established hs-cTn assays?
Does the Quidel TriageTrue hs-cTnI assay have comparable analytical performance to established hs-cTn assays?
The novel TriageTrue hs-cTnI assay demonstrates comparable analytical performance to established assays, supporting its use in lower-volume or rural healthcare settings.
Verifies TriageTrue hs-cTnI performance for rural labs; leaves open clinical outcome validation before adoption.
BACKGROUND: High sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays run on instruments suitable for small laboratories are a desirable commodity for rural cardiovascular testing. The Quidel TriageTrue hs-cTnI assay was recently approved as a laboratory test in Canada. This study aimed to verify the analytical performance of this novel hs-cTnI assay and perform a head-to-head comparison with other hs-cTn assays. METHODS: A precision study was performed for 5-6 days with 5 replicates daily using quality control (QC) materials and patient plasma pools corresponding to the clinical decision thresholds. Linearity was assessed based on preparation of patient plasma pools at target troponin concentrations spanning the analytical measuring range. Fresh samples from coronary intensive care unit patients and healthy volunteers were used for head-to-head comparison of the TriageTrue hs-cTnI assay against several hs-cTnI (Beckman Access and Siemens Atellica) and hs-cTnT (Roche Cobas e801) assays. Assay-specific overall 99th percentile upper reference limits (URL) were used to assess analytical concordance. Risk reclassification was analytically assessed by comparing the decision cutpoints using the 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 0/1 h algorithm for the different hs-cTn assays. RESULTS: QC and patient samples demonstrated a coefficient of variation (CV) <10% near the overall 99th percentile URL. TriageTrue hs-cTnI assay has a >90% analytical concordance at the 99th percentile URL and <10% risk reclassification compared to the Beckman Access and Siemens Atellica hs-cTnI assays. CONCLUSIONS: The novel TriageTrue hs-cTnI assay had comparable analytical performance as other hs-cTnI assays and can be considered in lower volume health care delivery settings with limited laboratory space.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wasylenko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: