Why the study?
Point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin testing reduces turnaround time, but few assays have validated 0/1-h accelerated diagnostic protocols endorsed for clinical practice.
Does a novel 0/1-h accelerated diagnostic protocol using point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin reduce emergency department length-of-stay compared to central laboratory testing in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome?
Does a novel 0/1-h accelerated diagnostic protocol using point-of-care high-sensitivity troponin reduce emergency department length-of-stay compared to central laboratory testing in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome?
The point-of-care Atellica VTLi high-sensitivity troponin assay demonstrated slightly higher than recommended analytical variability at the female 99th percentile, but acceptable performance at higher concentrations.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
POC hs-cTn enables faster ACS rule-out; extends accelerated protocols to point-of-care platforms.
High-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays in combination with clinical assessment and electrocardiogram are central to accelerated diagnostic protocols for rapid assessment of patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndrome (1). Point-of-care (POC) testing can reduce the total turnaround time and improve accessibility. To our knowledge, there are 3 commercially available high-sensitivity POC assays: PATHFAST (LSI Medience), TriageTrue (Quidel), and Atellica VTLi® (Siemens Healthineers) (2); only the first has 0/1-h cutoffs endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (1). A novel 0/1-h accelerated diagnostic protocol using the Atellica VTLi assay was recently used in the WESTCOR-POC randomized controlled trial (NCT05354804). In this trial of 1494 patients, emergency department length-of-stay was compared between the novel POC-based protocol, in which nonlaboratory staff performed the analysis, and a standard protocol using hs-cTnT measured on a central laboratory platform (3). The VTLi assay has a limit of detection of 1.6 ng/L and sex-specific 99th percentile upper reference limits of 18 ng/L for women and 27 ng/L for men (2). A previously proposed single-sample rule-out threshold of 4 ng/L (4), together with correlations with other central laboratory assays, informed a suggested 0-h cutoff of <6 ng/L with a 1-h delta <3 ng/L applied for rule-out used in this study. Cullen et al. provided supporting evidence for similar baseline and delta values in a 0/2-h accelerated diagnostic protocol (5). In the absence of validated rule-in criteria, values above the 99th percentile (>23 ng/L) were conservatively interpreted as “rule-in.” Cullen et al. proposed rule-in thresholds of ≥60 ng/L with a 2 h delta of ≥15 ng/L. The Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT assay was used in the control arm with 0/1 cutoffs endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology guidelines (1) (Table 1). The index diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) was adjudicated by 2 independent cardiologists using central hs-cTnT results and all available clinical data. During the inclusion periods, we did weekly (first year) to monthly (last year) quality control at 3 different concentrations (n = 41 quality control measurements/concentration). Quality control material was provided by the manufacturer. The long-term analytical variability (CV) including multiple different lots of cartridges and QC material per the 3 instruments ranged from 14.7% to 19.1% at a target of 17.8 ng/L (corresponding to the female 99th percentile), being slightly higher than the recommended 10% CV. At higher concentrations, CV ranged from 6.6% to 8.2% at 30.2 ng/L and 8.6% to 10.0% at 299.5 ng/L.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thulin et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: