Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
One hundred and forty-five adults with acute leukemia were randomized to receive remission induction therapy in or out of a protected environment (PE) with prophylactic antibiotics orally (PA) or systemically (SA). Sixty-three patients were randomized in PE and 82 outside a PE. The proportion of patients who survived long enough to receive an adequate trial was higher in the PE (97%) than out (82%) (P = .01). The complete remission (CR) rate was 71% in and 43% out of the PE (P less than .01). Fifty-five patients received PA and 90 received SA. The CR rates were 61% and 45%, respectively. Of the 145 patients, 73 (50%) developed 102 episodes of major infections. Twenty-six of 63 patients in the PE developed major infection compared to 47 of 82 outside a PE (P = .08). The incidence rate of 13% fatal infections in a PE was significantly smaller than the 28% rate outside a PE (P = .04). The number of days with infections at less than 500 neutrophils/mm3 was also significantly lower inside a PE than outside (P less than .01). When comparing patients receiving SA or PA, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infections. Forty-one patients received OAP Chemotherapy and 104 received adriamycin-OAP plus BCG. The CR rate on OAP was 44% compared with 60% on Ad-OAP + BCG. Infection rates were 76% and 40%, respectively (P less than .01). The median survival time was 72 weeks for patients in PE compared with 42 weeks for patients outside a PE (P less than .01). The prophylactic antibiotic regimens were well tolerated by most patients. This prospective randomized study has demonstrated statistically significant advantages for a lowered risk of fatal infection, higher CR rate and longer survival of patients treated in a PE with prophylactic antibiotics compared with patients treated in a conventional hospital room. Also, there was evidence for the superiority of adriamycin-OAP + BCG treatment compared with OAP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodriguez et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: