This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and potential efficacy of ex vivo expanded regulatory T cells (Tregs) for immune-mediated diseases. Nonetheless, achieving consistent and timely Treg yield and purity remains challenging. We aimed to evaluate the potential to enhance culture expansion of primary human total Treg (CD4+/CD25+/CD127lo) and Treg subpopulations through coculture with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (hUC-MSCs). In 14- to 21-day anti-CD3/anti-CD28-, interleukin-2-, and rapamycin-containing cultures, fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-purified total Treg underwent 4-fold greater expansion following hUC-MSC coculture. Potency to suppress T effector cell (Teff) proliferation was equivalent for hUC-MSC-cocultured and control Tregs and correlated with the expression of HLA-DR, CD39, and inducible costimulator (ICOS). The impact of hUC-MSC coculture on ex vivo expansion of 3 FACS-purified Treg subpopulations [CD45RA+ (Subtype I), CD45RA-HLA-DR+ (Subtype II), and CD45RA-HLA-DR- (Subtype III)] was then investigated. Both initial and continuous hUC-MSC coculture yielded significantly higher fold expansion of each Treg subpopulation compared to control. However, the magnitude of enhancement was substantially greater for non-naive (Subtypes II and III) than for naive (Subtype I) Treg. Coculture with hUC-MSC increased HLA-DR expression of all 3 expanded Treg subpopulations while maintaining comparable Teff suppressive potency. For non-naive Treg (Subtypes II and III), both initial and continuous hUC-MSC coculture also increased the final %Foxp3+ and %Helios+. Thus, coculture with clinical-grade hUC-MSC substantially enhances the ex vivo yield, preserves the suppressive potency, and modulates HLA-DR expression of FACS-purified Treg subpopulations with greatest effect on non-naive (CD45RA-) Treg. The findings have potential to facilitate identification, functional characterization, and manufacturing of Treg subpopulations with distinct therapeutic benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ou et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: