Why the study?
Medical imaging modalities present challenges like intensity inhomogeneity, noise, low contrast, and ill-defined boundaries that make automated segmentation difficult.
Does the proposed automated segmentation method using Harris Hawk optimization and an active contour model improve segmentation accuracy in medical images compared to state-of-the-art algorithms?
Does the proposed automated segmentation method using Harris Hawk optimization and an active contour model improve segmentation accuracy in medical images compared to state-of-the-art algorithms?
A novel automated segmentation method using Harris Hawk optimization and active contour models achieves high accuracy (Dice Score 0.93) on cardiac MRI datasets.
May assist automated segmentation amid imaging artifacts; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Medical image segmentation is a key step to assist diagnosis of several diseases, and accuracy of a segmentation method is important for further treatments of different diseases. Different medical imaging modalities have different challenges such as intensity inhomogeneity, noise, low contrast, and ill-defined boundaries, which make automated segmentation a difficult task. To handle these issues, we propose a new fully automated method for medical image segmentation, which utilizes the advantages of thresholding and an active contour model. In this study, a Harris Hawks optimizer is applied to determine the optimal thresholding value, which is used to obtain the initial contour for segmentation. The obtained contour is further refined by using a spatially varying Gaussian kernel in the active contour model. The proposed method is then validated using a standard skin dataset (ISBI 2016), which consists of variable-sized lesions and different challenging artifacts, and a standard cardiac magnetic resonance dataset (ACDC, MICCAI 2017) with a wide spectrum of normal hearts, congenital heart diseases, and cardiac dysfunction. Experimental results show that the proposed method can effectively segment the region of interest and produce superior segmentation results for skin (overall Dice Score 0.90) and cardiac dataset (overall Dice Score 0.93), as compared to other state-of-the-art algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tamoor et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: