Why the study?
Does ultrasound energy increase the beat frequency in isolated neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes?
Does ultrasound energy increase the beat frequency in isolated neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes?
Low-intensity, short-duration ultrasound pulses can effectively increase the beat frequency of neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, suggesting potential for novel non-electrical pacing modalities.
Ultrasound may increase cardiomyocyte beat frequency in vitro; hypothesis-generating for non-electrical pacing and requires in vivo validation.
Isolated neonatal rat ventricular cardiomyocytes were used to study the influence of ultrasound on the chronotropic response in a tissue culture model. The beat frequency of the cells, varying from 40 to 90 beats/min, was measured based upon the translocation of the nuclear membrane captured by a high-speed camera. Ultrasound pulses (frequency = 2.5 MHz) were delivered at 300-ms intervals [3.33 Hz pulse repetition frequency (PRF)], in turn corresponding to 200 pulses/min. The intensity of acoustic energy and pulse duration were made variable, 0.02-0.87 W/cm(2) and 1-5 ms, respectively. In 57 of 99 trials, there was a noted average increase in beat frequency of 25% with 8-s exposures to ultrasonic pulses. Applied ultrasound energy with a spatial peak time average acoustic intensity (Ispta) of 0.02 W/cm(2) and pulse duration of 1 ms effectively increased the contraction rate of cardiomyocytes (P < 0.05). Of the acoustic power tested, the lowest level of acoustic intensity and shortest pulse duration proved most effective at increasing the electrophysiological responsiveness and beat frequency of cardiomyocytes. Determining the optimal conditions for delivery of ultrasound will be essential to developing new models for understanding mechanoelectrical coupling (MEC) and understanding novel nonelectrical pacing modalities for clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fleischman et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: