Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: High levels of factor VIII (FVIII) expression are needed for various applications to treat Hemophilia A. Besides deletion of the B-domain (BDD) and codon-optimization, F309S mutation, and other 5 mutations (X5) in FVIII were previously described to increase its expression. Objectives: To investigate whether combining the 6 aforementioned mutations (X6) results in a further increase of FVIII expression. Methods: The 5 (X5) and 6 (X6) mutations were introduced into a BDD-FVIII (wild-type [WT]), and proteins were expressed in cell cultures with different transgene copy numbers, purified, and tested for specific activity, binding to von Willebrand factor and a low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein fragment, tyrosine sulfation levels and immunogenicity in silico and in human T-cell culture. The 6 mutations were also reproduced in full-length FVIII (FL-FVIII) and tested for secretion levels. Results: From the single-copy transgene cell lines, secretion levels of X5 and X6 increased 1.6-fold and 2.3-fold, respectively, compared with WT. These levels increased proportionally with increasing transgene copy number, approaching saturation. The specific activity, binding to von Willebrand factor and lipoprotein receptor-related protein fragment, and assessments of immunogenicity of X6 in model systems were similar to WT, while tyrosine sulfation levels, were moderately lower at the highest gene dose. However, the 6 mutations reproduced in FL-FVIII did not result in increased secretion. Conclusion: Combining the 6 mutations in BDD-FVIII improved its expression and did not affect general protein properties, making it promising for future product development. The data also indicate that BDD-FVIII and FL-FVIII have different expression mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: