Why the study?
Do psychological variables such as anger, attention, and stressful life events predict injury risk in adolescent football players?
Do psychological variables such as anger, attention, and stressful life events predict injury risk in adolescent football players?
Psychological factors, specifically outward anger, low focused attention, and recent stressful life events combined with reduced vigilance, are significant predictors of injury risk in adolescent football players.
May flag higher injury risk in adolescent athletes via anger/attention screening; leaves open whether interventions reduce injuries.
Explored the relationship of anger/aggression, attention, and stressful life events to injury while addressing the methodological limitations of prior studies. An additional objective was to determine whether the relationship of stressful life events to injury is mediated either by anger (directed either inward or outward) or by impaired attention, either vigilant (broad, external) or focused (narrow, internal). At the beginning of summer practice, 120 first-string high school football players completed measures of anger (Framingham Anger Scale), vigilant attention (Symbol Digit Modalities test), focused attention (Pursuit subtest, MacQuarrie Test of Mechanical Ability), and stressful life events (abbreviated form of the Social Readjustment Rating Scale as modified for use with adolescents by Coddington, 1972). Players were then followed through one season to identify those injured. Logistic regression indicated that high anger directed outward (p < .05) and low focused attention (p < .01) increased injury risk, while stressful life events and vigilant attention interacted. Injury risk was elevated when recent stress was present (p < .05), and increased as vigilance decreased, suggesting that stressful life events elevate injury risk by reducing vigilance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thompson et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: