Why the study?
The authors sought to assess sex differences in the association of machine learning computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (ML-FFR CT) with incident cardiovascular outcomes.
Does the prognostic value of machine learning computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (ML-FFRCT) for predicting death or myocardial infarction differ by sex in patients with suspected CAD?
Does the prognostic value of machine learning computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (ML-FFRCT) for predicting death or myocardial infarction differ by sex in patients with suspected CAD?
In a high-risk cohort, ML-FFRCT was higher in women than men, but its prognostic value for predicting death or MI did not significantly differ by sex.
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) derived machine learning fractional flow reserve (ML-FFR CT ) can assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery stenoses. We aimed to assess sex differences in the association of ML-FFR CT and incident cardiovascular outcomes. We studied a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent clinically indicated CCTA and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Obstructive stenosis was defined as ≥ 70% stenosis severity in non-left main vessels or ≥ 50% in the left main coronary. ML-FFR CT was computed using a machine learning algorithm with significant stenosis defined as ML-FFR CT < 0.8. The primary outcome was a composite of death or non-fatal myocardial infarction (D/MI). Our study population consisted of 471 patients with mean (SD) age 65 (13) years, 53% men, and multiple comorbidities (78% hypertension, 66% diabetes, 81% dyslipidemia). Compared to men, women were less likely to have obstructive stenosis by CCTA (9% vs. 18%; p = 0.006), less multivessel CAD (4% vs. 6%; p = 0.25), lower prevalence of ML-FFR CT < 0.8 (39% vs. 44%; p = 0.23) and higher median (IQR) ML-FFR CT (0.76 (0.53–0.86) vs. 0.71 (0.47–0.84); p = 0.047). In multivariable adjusted models, there was no significant association between ML-FFR CT < 0.8 and D/MI [Hazard Ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval (0.30, 2.20); p = 0.25 for interaction with sex.]. In a high-risk cohort of symptomatic patients who underwent CCTA and SPECT testing, ML-FFR CT was higher in women than men. There was no significant association between ML-FFR CT and incident mortality or MI and no evidence that the prognostic value of ML-FFR CT differs by sex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rifai et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: