Pacing on the T wave can occur when a premature ventricular contraction falls in the post-ventricular atrial blanking period, preventing pacemaker inhibition.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights rare DDD pacing interaction; hypothesis-generating and should not alter practice without prospective data.
We present the case of a 50-year-old man who had a dual-chamber pacemaker that was implanted because of symptomatic bradycardia. The pacemaker was programmed in a DDD mode, with a lower rate of 70 beats/min; upper rate, 120 beats/min; paced atrioventricular (AV) delay, 180 ms; sensed AV delay, 150 ms; and V-blanking period, 200 ms.In Figure 1 (previous page), the ECG shows intermittent AV sequential electronic pacing (complexes 4–5 are sinus followed by electronic ventricular pacing), with premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) in the 3rd, 6th, 7th, and 8th complexes. In Figure 2, the short arrows designate the atrial-ventricular interval (A-V), which is a period that may elapse after an atrial activity before the ventricle must be paced. The long, horizontal arrows show the interval between atrial pacing.The index PVC, the 11th beat, is a pseudo-pseudofusion beat.If an atrial pacing output occurs in the presence of an already depolarized myocardium by an intrinsic premature beat (in this case, the PVC), the pacer output cannot contribute to the myocardial depolarization, and, therefore, the QRS is formed entirely by the intrinsic PVC beat. Furthermore, notice that the index PVC falls in the post-ventricular atrial blanking period (PVAB); therefore, the pacemaker was not inhibited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gahremanpour et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: