Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines the ways in which issues of `secularism' are politicized within the nation state, particularly the ways in which women's rights become critical sites of conflict surrounding political hegemony and minority rights. Focusing on judgments related to Muslim women in post-Independence India, it argues that legal solutions have the potential to be powerful instruments for achieving greater gender equity as well as insidious sites for recuperation of gender, class, and religious hegemonies in the guise of protection and liberation. The slippage between the stated intent, subtext, and effects of both `progressive' and `reactionary' legislation indicates that feminist theorists should engage with issues of personal law strategically while seeking alternate meanings of community and identity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Srimati Basu (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: