Why the study?
Patients with a history of malignancy are at elevated risk for ACS, prompting an evaluation of their in-hospital cardiovascular outcomes compared with patients without cancer.
Does a history of cancer worsen in-hospital outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome?
Does a history of cancer worsen in-hospital outcomes in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome?
A history of cancer in patients presenting with ACS is associated with significantly higher in-hospital risks of mortality, bleeding, MACE, and stroke, highlighting the need for individualized management in this vulnerable population.
ACS patients with cancer history face higher in-hospital mortality and complications; leaves open whether targeted strategies improve prognosis.
BACKGROUND: Patients with a history of malignancy are at elevated risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study evaluates in-hospital cardiovascular outcomes in ACS patients with and without a cancer history. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov (2000-2025) identified studies comparing in-hospital outcomes for ACS in patients with vs. without malignancy. Data were pooled and analyzed using RevMan 5.4, calculating risk ratios (RRs) under a random-effects model. RESULTS: Fifteen studies were included. Among ACS patients, a history of cancer was associated with significantly worse in-hospital outcomes. Cancer history increased all-cause mortality by 44% [RR: 1.44; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21-1.71; P < 0.001], bleeding by 72% (RR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.33-2.22; P < 0.001), major adverse cardiac events (MACE) by 18% (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.17-1.19; P < 0.001), and stroke by 48% (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.35-1.63; P < 0.001). No significant associations were observed for heart failure (RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.96-1.59; P = 0.10), re-infarction (RR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.83-1.65; P = 0.36), or cardiogenic shock (RR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.97-1.55; P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: Patients with a history of malignancy presenting with ACS face significantly higher in-hospital risks of mortality, bleeding, MACE, and stroke, while risks of heart failure, re-infarction, and shock show nonsignificant trends. These findings underscore the vulnerability of this population and highlight the need for multidisciplinary, individualized management strategies to improve outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: