Why the study?
Does atorvastatin reduce angiotensin II-mediated venoconstriction in hypercholesterolemic men?
Does atorvastatin reduce angiotensin II-mediated venoconstriction in hypercholesterolemic men?
Statin treatment does not attenuate angiotensin II-induced venoconstriction in hypercholesterolemic men, suggesting that the pleiotropic effects of statins may not be mediated through direct vascular renin-angiotensin system inhibition.
Statin therapy does not attenuate Ang II venoconstriction; challenges direct vascular RAS inhibition as a pleiotropic mechanism.
UNLABELLED: Experimental studies suggested that statins attenuate vascular AT1 receptor responsiveness. Moreover, the augmented excessive pressor response to systemic angiotensin II infusions in hypercholesterolemic patients was normalized with statin treatment. In 12 hypercholesterolemic patients, we tested the hypothesis that statin treatment attenuates angiotensin II-mediated vasoconstriction in hand veins assessed by a linear variable differential transducer. Subjects ingested daily doses of either atorvastatin (40 mg) or positive control irbesartan (150 mg) for 30 days in a randomized and cross-over fashion. Ang II-induced venoconstriction at minute 4 averaged 59%±10% before and 28%±9% after irbesartan (mean ± SEM; P<0.05) compared to 65%±11% before and 73%±11% after 30 days of atorvastatin treatment. Plasma angiotensin levels increased significantly after irbesartan treatment (Ang II: 17±22 before vs 52±40 pg/mL after [p = 0.048]; Ang-(1-7): 18±10 before vs 37±14 pg/mL after [p = 0.002]) compared to atorvastatin treatment (Ang II: 9±4 vs 11±10 pg/mL [p = 0.40]; Ang-(1-7): 24±9 vs 32±8 pg/mL [p = 0.023]). Our study suggests that statin treatment does not elicit major changes in angiotensin II-mediated venoconstriction or in circulating angiotensin II levels whereas angiotensin-(1-7) levels increased modestly. The discrepancy between local vascular and systemic angiotensin II responses might suggest that statin treatment interferes with blood pressure buffering reflexes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00154024.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schindler et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: