Why the study?
The role of nurse-led motivational interviewing in improving self-care in patients with heart failure is promising, but required further empirical evidence to determine its efficacy.
Does nurse-led motivational interviewing improve self-care maintenance in adults with heart failure?
Does nurse-led motivational interviewing improve self-care maintenance in adults with heart failure?
Nurse-led motivational interviewing significantly improves self-care maintenance in adults with heart failure, with effects sustained over one year.
Nurse-led MI may boost HF self-care; extends RCT evidence for behavioral interventions in chronic HF management.
Background: The role of nurse-led motivational interviewing (MI) in improving self-care among patients with heart failure (HF) is promising, even if it still requires further empirical evidence to determine its efficacy. For this reason, this study tested its efficacy in enhancing self-care maintenance (primary endpoint), self-care management, and self-care confidence after three months from enrollment in adults with HF compared to usual care, and assessed changes in self-care over follow-up times (3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Methods: A single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, superiority study with two experimental arms and a control group was performed. Allocation was in a 1:1:1 ratio between intervention groups and control. Results: MI was effective in improving self-care maintenance after three months when it was performed only for patients (arm 1) and for the patients–caregivers dyad (arm 2) (respectively, Cohen’s d = 0.92, p-value < 0.001; Cohen’s d = 0.68, p-value < 0.001). These effects were stable over the one-year follow-up. No effects were observed concerning self-care management, while MI moderately influenced self-care confidence. Conclusions: This study supported the adoption of nurse-led MI in the clinical management of adults with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dellafiore et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: