Key result
An educational intervention based on motivational interviewing significantly improved self-care compared with a conventional educational intervention in patients with chronic heart failure (P=0.005).
Why the study?
Although structured educational programs improve HF self-care, some patients show resistance and low motivation for change.
Does an educational intervention based on motivational interviewing improve self-care and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure compared to a conventional educational intervention?
Does an educational intervention based on motivational interviewing improve self-care and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure compared to a conventional educational intervention?
p-value: p=.005
Motivational interviewing delivered by trained nurses significantly improves self-care behaviors in patients recently hospitalized for heart failure compared to conventional education.
May support motivational interviewing for HF self-care education; hypothesis-generating and requires confirmation in larger trials.
BACKGROUND: Self-care is an integral component of successful chronic heart failure (HF) management. Structured educational programs have already been shown to be effective in improving self-care, but some patients show resistance and little motivation for change. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare efficacy in improving self-care and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for an educational intervention based on motivational interviewing (MI) compared with a conventional educational intervention. METHODS: This experimental pretest-posttest study with an equivalent historical control group included 93 patients in the intervention group and 93 matched patients in the control group. Participants attended a first visit after HF hospitalization discharge and 6 to 7 follow-up visits during 6 months. The European Heart Failure Self-care Behavior scale and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire were used to assess self-care and HRQoL, respectively. Data on mortality and hospital readmissions were collected as adverse events. RESULTS: Self-care improved significantly more in the MI-based intervention group than in the control group ( P = .005). Although both self-care and HRQoL improved in both groups over time ( P < .05), there was no significant between-group difference in terms of HRQoL improvement over time ( P = .13). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that MI delivered by MI-trained nurses is effective in significantly improving self-care by patients with HF. Nonetheless, further studies are required to evaluate the impact of MI on other outcomes, such as HRQoL and adverse clinical events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garcimartín et al. (2021) studied Chronic heart failure (n=186). Educational intervention based on motivational interviewing vs. Conventional educational intervention was evaluated on Self-care and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) (p=.005). An educational intervention based on motivational interviewing significantly improved self-care compared with a conventional educational intervention in patients with chronic heart failure (P=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: