Why the study?
Does the proportion of excess cardiovascular events attributable to systolic blood pressure vary with age, and how does this affect the relative efficacy of mass treatment versus case-finding strategies?
Population
Men and women 45 years of age or older in the United States during 1980.
Design
Other
Follow-up
18 years
Authors
Loading...
May support mass BP lowering in younger adults and case-finding in older; leaves open prospective validation.
Does the proportion of excess cardiovascular events attributable to systolic blood pressure vary with age, and how does this affect the relative efficacy of mass treatment versus case-finding strategies?
A mass treatment strategy to lower blood pressure has a greater potential impact in younger populations, whereas a high-risk case-finding approach is more effective in older populations.
Klag et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: