Why the study?
What factors influence the choice between neuraxial and general anesthesia for primary hip and knee arthroplasty?
What factors influence the choice between neuraxial and general anesthesia for primary hip and knee arthroplasty?
This review highlights the need for unbiased educational materials and familiarization with evidence to promote the use of neuraxial anesthesia in joint arthroplasty.
Persistent variation in THA/TKA anesthesia choice persists; leaves open whether education and patient materials will increase neuraxial adoption.
Despite evidence in the literature, continuing wide variation exists in anesthetic technique for primary joint arthroplasties. Recent evidence suggests that neuraxial anesthesia has advantages over general anesthesia in terms of mortality, major morbidity and healthcare utilization. Yet, despite the proposed benefits, utilization of these two techniques varies greatly across geographical locations, with general anesthesia being most common for total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in parts of the world. We uncover some factors that promote or hinder the use of neuraxial anesthesia in THA and TKA. Healthcare professionals should be familiarized with the evidence for neuraxial anesthesia, and unbiased educational material should be developed for patients regarding anesthetic options for THA and TKA in order to promote best practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wong et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: