Why the study?
Patients with HFpEF face regional variation in services and poor integration between community and secondary care, conflicting with policy goals to improve care coordination.
Coordination of care for HFpEF patients faces significant challenges due to system complexity, poor information transfer, and relational disconnects between primary and secondary care.
Regional HFpEF service gaps conflict with policy goals; leaves open optimal coordination models for complex patients.
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) are a complex and underserved group. They are commonly older patients with multiple comorbidities, who rely on multiple healthcare services. Regional variation in services and resourcing has been highlighted as a problem in heart failure care, with few teams bridging the interface between the community and secondary care. These reports conflict with policy goals to improve coordination of care and dissolve boundaries between specialist services and the community. AIM: To explore how care is coordinated for patients with HFpEF, with a focus on the interface between primary care and specialist services in England. METHODS: We applied systems thinking methodology to examine the relationship between work-as-imagined and work-as-done for coordination of care for patients with HFpEF. We analysed clinical guidelines in conjunction with a secondary applied thematic analysis of semistructured interviews with healthcare professionals caring for patients with HFpEF including general practitioners, specialist nurses and cardiologists and patients with HFpEF themselves (n=41). Systems Thinking for Everyday Work principles provided a sensitising theoretical framework to facilitate a deeper understanding of how these data illustrate a complex health system and where opportunities for improvement interventions may lie. Participants raised educational needs, challenging work conditions, issues with information transfer systems and organisational structures poorly aligned with patient needs. CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple challenges that affect coordination of care for patients with HFpEF. Findings from this study illuminate the complexity in coordination of care practices and have implications for future interventional work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brooman‐White et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: