Why the study?
The study was designed to investigate the effects of isovolumetric training with versus without blood flow restriction on muscle hypertrophy, power, strength, and aerobic capacity.
Does low-intensity blood flow restriction training improve muscle size, power, and VO2max compared to high-intensity training without restriction in active adults?
Does low-intensity blood flow restriction training improve muscle size, power, and VO2max compared to high-intensity training without restriction in active adults?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BFR and higher-intensity training produced similar gains with lower RPE in BFR; leaves open efficacy in clinical populations.
Introduction/Purpose This study aimed to investigate the effects of isovolumetric training with and without blood flow restriction (BFR) on muscle hypertrophy, power, strength, and aerobic capacity. Methods Twenty participants (30.2 ± 7.7 yr, 69.6 ± 15.0 kg, 166.8 ± 7.3 cm) were randomized to a control ( n = 11) or BFR group ( n = 9). Testing sessions included measurement of bilateral thigh circumference, cross-sectional area of the vastus lateralis and biceps femoris via ultrasound imaging, determination of maximum oxygen consumption (V̇O 2max ) and power output via rowing, and estimated one-repetition maximum (1-RM) deadlift. Participants trained twice weekly for 4 wk. The BFR group (applied to thighs bilaterally at 80% occlusion) rowed at 40% maximum power output and lifted 30% 1-RM for 1 × 20 reps and 3 × 10 reps. The control group rowed at 80% power and lifted 60% 1-RM for 1 × 10 reps and 3 × 5 reps. Results Analyses indicated a main effect over time ( P = 0.001) for power ( P = 0.001), cross-sectional area of vastus lateralis and biceps femoris bilaterally ( P = 0.001 for both), and V̇O 2max ( P = 0.003), indicating that both groups improved over time. Results also indicated that the control group had higher ratings of perceived exertion than the BFR group during training ( P = 0.04). Conclusions The two types of training did not produce different results, except the BFR group had a higher output in maximum power. BFR training can be a feasible option for individuals unable to train at 60%–80% of maximum allowing for progressive rehabilitation with lower intensity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bradley et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: