Key result
Bilateral lower limb aerobic blood flow restriction training resulted in no significant difference in VO2max over seven weeks compared to non-BFR training.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to explore the effect of blood flow restriction training on aerobic performance.
Does peripheral lower body blood flow restriction training improve maximum oxygen consumption in recreationally active adults?
RCT (n=7)
Randomly assigned
Does peripheral lower body blood flow restriction training improve maximum oxygen consumption in recreationally active adults?
Bilateral lower limb aerobic blood flow restriction training does not improve VO2max over seven weeks in recreationally active adults.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BFR training does not augment VO2max gains; confirms no additive benefit over standard aerobic exercise in active adults.
Introduction: Blood flow restriction (BFR) training is a novel training method that has been shown to promote positive aerobic and anaerobic adaptations under low intensity exercise by inhibiting blood flow to target tissue resulting in hypoxia and metabolic byproduct accumulation. This has been shown to have a direct positive effect on aerobic performance adaptation. The purpose was to explore the effect of BFR training on aerobic performance. Methods: Seven recreationally active adults were randomly assigned to either the BFR group (n=4, BFR) or non-BFR group (n=3, CON). Three testing sessions were conducted throughout the study (Pre-Test, Mid-Test, Post-Test) which consisted of a graded cycle ergometer maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) test using COSMED-K5 indirect calorimetry. Eleven BFR training sessions were performed consisting of 20-min of cycling at 35-45% of heart rate reserve (HRR) with at 60% (BFR) or 5% (CON) arterial occlusion pressure (AOP) on the BFR cuffs. Results: Absolute VO2max, Relative VO2max, respiratory exchange ratio (RER), maximum heart rate (HRmax), and maximum rate of perceived exertion (RPEmax) reported no significant difference between BFR and CON. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) found in time to reach VO2max and maximum watts (Wmax) reached which declined over the course of the training intervention. Conclusions: Bilateral lower limb aerobic BFR training resulted in no change in VO2max over seven weeks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bennett et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Recreationally active adults (n=7). Blood flow restriction (BFR) training vs. Non-BFR training (5% arterial occlusion pressure) was evaluated on VO2max. Bilateral lower limb aerobic blood flow restriction training resulted in no significant difference in VO2max over seven weeks compared to non-BFR training.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: