Why the study?
Does continuous pulse contour (LiDCO plus) cardiac output measurement accurately correlate with intermittent bolus thermodilution in patients with impaired left ventricular function after cardiac surgery?
Does continuous pulse contour (LiDCO plus) cardiac output measurement accurately correlate with intermittent bolus thermodilution in patients with impaired left ventricular function after cardiac surgery?
LiDCO continuous pulse contour cardiac output measurement shows good correlation and acceptable limits of agreement with thermodilution in post-cardiac surgery patients with impaired LV function, suggesting it could potentially replace thermodilution in the ICU.
LiDCO shows acceptable agreement with thermodilution in impaired LV function; leaves open routine replacement pending prospective validation.
After cardiac surgery, patients with low left ventricular ejection fraction probably benefit the most from accurate monitoring of continuous cardiac output. Thirty patients with impaired ventricular function were studied, and intermittent bolus thermodilution and continuous pulse contour (LiDCO plus™) cardiac output compared. Following lithium dilution calibration, a total of 220 paired results were recorded. Thermodilution and LiDCO measurements ranged from 2.3 to 11.0 and 2.6 to 10.8 l.min(-1), respectively. Corresponding means (SD) were 6.1 (1.6) and 6.2 (1.9) l.min(-1), with coefficients of variance of 26 and 31%, respectively. The correlation coefficient was 0.82, bias 0.28 l.min(-1) with upper and lower limits of agreement 1.96 and -1.41 l.min(-1); the percentage error was 27%. LiDCO showed good correlation, marginal bias and acceptable limits of agreement and percentage error. It could therefore potentially replace thermodilution as a means of measuring cardiac output in the ICU, particularly when determination of pulmonary artery pressure is not required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mora et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: