Why the study?
The phenomenon of multiple myocardial diseases in a single patient remains understudied, prompting investigation into the prevalence and impact of myocarditis in patients with genetic cardiomyopathies and its treatment outcomes.
Does treatment of myocarditis improve outcomes in patients with genetic cardiomyopathies?
Does treatment of myocarditis improve outcomes in patients with genetic cardiomyopathies?
Myocarditis is highly prevalent across various genetic cardiomyopathies, and its targeted treatment may stabilize clinical condition and reduce adverse outcomes.
Myocarditis in genetic cardiomyopathies may warrant evaluation; leaves open need for prospective trials before practice change.
Myocardial disease is an important component of the wide field of cardiovascular disease. However, the phenomenon of multiple myocardial diseases in a single patient remains understudied. The aim of the present study was to investigate the prevalence and impact of myocarditis in patients with genetic cardiomyopathies and to evaluate the outcomes of myocarditis treatment in the context of cardiomyopathies. A total of 342 patients with primary cardiomyopathies were enrolled. The study cohort included 125 patients with left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC), 100 with primary myocardial hypertrophy syndrome, 70 with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), 60 with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and 30 with restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM). The diagnosis of myocarditis was based on data from myocardial morphological examination or a non-invasive diagnostic algorithm consisting of an analysis of clinical presentation, anti-cardiac antibody (Ab) titres and cardiac MRI. The prevalence of myocarditis was 74.3% in ARVC, 56.7% in DCM, 54.4% in LVNC, 37.5% in RCM and 30.9% in HCM. Myocarditis had primary viral or secondary autoimmune nature and manifested with the onset or worsening of chronic heart failure (CHF) and arrhythmias. Treatment of myocarditis in cardiomyopathies has been shown to stabilise or improve patient condition and reduce the likelihood of adverse outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lutokhina et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: