Why the study?
Does the indirect fluorescent antibody technique provide a rapid diagnostic procedure for hand, foot, and mouth disease compared to neutralization tests?
Does the indirect fluorescent antibody technique provide a rapid diagnostic procedure for hand, foot, and mouth disease compared to neutralization tests?
The indirect fluorescent antibody technique is a rapid and effective diagnostic procedure for detecting clinical and subclinical coxsackie A16 infection in hand, foot, and mouth disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
IFA supports rapid detection of clinical and subclinical coxsackie A16; leaves open prospective validation before replacing neutralization testing.
Brown et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: