Why the study?
Does sirolimus-eluting stent implantation improve clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to bare metal stents in dialysis patients with coronary artery disease?
Does sirolimus-eluting stent implantation improve clinical and angiographic outcomes compared to bare metal stents in dialysis patients with coronary artery disease?
In dialysis patients, the use of longer and/or smaller diameter sirolimus-eluting stents was associated with higher rates of restenosis and target lesion revascularization compared to bare metal stents.
Associated with higher restenosis and revascularization in dialysis patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Reports regarding the relationship between the length and diameter of implanted drug-eluting stents and clinical and angiographic outcomes in dialysis patients are limited. AIM: We investigated the efficiency of drug-eluting stents for coronary artery disease in patients on dialysis from the viewpoint of stent sizing. METHODS: Sirolimus-eluting stents were implanted in 88 lesions and bare metal stents were implanted in 43 lesions. We compared stenting strategy, major adverse cardiac events, and angiographic results between sirolimus-eluting stent and bare metal stent groups. RESULTS: Stent diameter was smaller and stent length was longer in the sirolimus-eluting stent group than in the bare metal stent group in our routine practices. There was no significant between-group difference in late diameter loss. Rates of angiographic restenosis and target lesion revascularization were significantly higher in the sirolimus-eluting stent group than in the bare metal stent group. Although stent length was significantly longer and stent diameter was smaller in the sirolimus-eluting stent group, sirolimus-eluting stents did not improve the subsequent clinical and angiographic results compared with bare metal stents in dialysis patients. CONCLUSION: In dialysis patients, a longer length and/or smaller diameter sirolimus-eluting stent implantation was associated with high rates of restenosis and target lesion revascularization compared with bare metal stents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujita et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: