Why the study?
Does EAMS-guided CRT implantation reduce fluoroscopy time and angiography use compared to traditional CRT implantation in patients requiring CRT?
Does EAMS-guided CRT implantation reduce fluoroscopy time and angiography use compared to traditional CRT implantation in patients requiring CRT?
EAMS-guided CRT implantation is safe, effective, and significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and the need for coronary sinus angiography compared to traditional methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May reduce fluoroscopy exposure during CRT implantation; leaves open need for randomized trials to confirm clinical benefit.
Greco et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: