Why the study?
Does the Influenza A and B assay accurately detect influenza viruses A and B compared to a respiratory panel reference method in archived nasopharyngeal swab specimens?
Does the Influenza A and B assay accurately detect influenza viruses A and B compared to a respiratory panel reference method in archived nasopharyngeal swab specimens?
The rapid Influenza A and B assay demonstrates moderate sensitivity for Influenza A and high sensitivity and specificity for Influenza B, indicating its potential as a point-of-care diagnostic test.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Facilitates rapid CLIA-waived influenza testing on archived samples; leaves open prospective diagnostic validation.
Influenza is a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses A and B in humans and causes a significant amount of morbidity and mortality every year. The Influenza A and B assay was the first CLIA-waived molecular rapid flu test available. The Influenza A and B test works by employing isothermal amplification with influenza-specific primers followed by target detection with molecular beacon probes. Here, the performance of the Influenza A and B assay on frozen, archived nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) specimens stored in viral transport medium (VTM) were compared to a respiratory panel assay. The performance of the Influenza A and B assay was evaluated by comparing the results to the respiratory panel reference method. The sensitivity for total influenza virus A was 67.5% (95% CI (CI), 56.6-78.5) and the specificity was 86.9% (CI, 71.0-100). For influenza virus B testing, the sensitivity and specificity were 90.2% (CI, 68.5-100) and 98.8% (CI, 68.5-100), respectively. This system has the advantage of a significantly shorter test time than any other currently available molecular assay and the simple, pipette-free procedure runs on a fully integrated, closed, small-footprint system. Overall, the Influenza A and B assay evaluated in this study has the potential to serve as a point-of-care rapid influenza diagnostic test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Otto et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: