Key result
Elevated sTWEAK and MCP-1 levels correlate with greater CAD severity in stage 2-3 CKD.
Cross-Sectional (n=97)
PURPOSE: Patients diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a greater rate of cardiovascular mortality when compared with the general population. The soluble form of TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK) and monocyte chemoattractan protein 1 (MCP-1) play important roles in cellular proliferation, migration and apoptosis. The current study aimed to analyze whether soluble TWEAK (sTWEAK) and MCP-1 levels are associated with the severity of coronary arterial disease (CAD) in CKD patients. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients diagnosed with CKD stages 2-3 according to their estimated glomerular filtration rate and the presence of kidney injury were included in the study. Plasma sTWEAK and MCP-1 concentrations were determined using commercially available ELISA kits. Coronary angiographies were performed through femoral artery access using the Judkins technique. RESULTS: Correlation analysis of sTWEAK and Gensini scores showed significant association (p < 0.01, r(2) = 0.287). Also significant correlation has been found in MCP-1 levels and Gensini scores (p < 0.01, r(2) = 0.414). When patients were divided into two groups with a limit of 17 according to their Gensini score, sTWEAK levels indicated a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a relationship between sTWEAK and MCP-1 levels and CAD in CKD stages 2-3 patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akdoğan et al. (2015) conducted a cross-sectional in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (n=97). Plasma soluble TWEAK and MCP-1 levels was evaluated on Severity of coronary artery disease as measured by Gensini scores (r2 = 0.287 (sTWEAK), r2 = 0.414 (MCP-1), p=<0.01). Plasma levels of sTWEAK (r2=0.287) and MCP-1 (r2=0.414) were significantly correlated with angiographic coronary artery disease severity in patients with CKD stages 2-3 (p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: