Why the study?
Does alteration of preload via lower body negative pressure or volume loading affect the transmitral flow velocity pattern measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography?
Does alteration of preload via lower body negative pressure or volume loading affect the transmitral flow velocity pattern measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography?
Changes in preload significantly alter the peak velocity and first half integral of left ventricular rapid filling on transmitral Doppler echocardiography, highlighting the load-dependency of these diastolic parameters.
Preload reduction or loading alters transmitral rapid filling velocity; leaves open whether these Doppler indices reliably reflect intrinsic diastolic function independent of load.
The transmitral flow (TMF) profile was studied in 18 patients with ischemic heart disease and in 4 patients with chest pain syndrome in order to clarify the dependency of preload alteration on the pattern of TMF. Pulsed Doppler echocardiography with simultaneous measurement of right-sided cardiac catheterization and M-mode echocardiography during lower body negative pressures (LBNP 0, -10 mmHg, -20 mmHg) and Dextran infusions (Dex 100 ml, 200 ml) were used in the study. After LBNP, peak velocities in rapid filling (peak R) (cm/sec) decreased (control; 68.3 +/- 13.9, LBNP-10 mmHg; 59.8 +/- 15.2, p less than 0.01, LBNP-20 mmHg; 55.2 +/- 11.0, p less than 0.01) and the integrals in the first half phase in rapid filling (IR1) (cm) also decreased (control; 4.0 +/- 0.8, LBNP-10 mmHg; 3.4 +/- 0.9, LBNP-20 mmHg; 3.2 +/- 0.9, p less than 0.05). During Dextran infusion, peak R (cm/sec) increased (control; 53.5 +/- 7.5, Dex 100 ml; 57.8 +/- 10.0, p less than 0.05, Dex 200 ml; 60.4 +/- 10.6, p less than 0.01) as did IR1 (cm) (control; 3.2 +/- 1.1, Dex 100 ml; 3.8 +/- 1.0, p less than 0.01, Dex 200 ml; 4.2 +/- 1.3, p less than 0.01). In conclusion, changes in preload may alter the peak velocity and the first half integral in left ventricular rapid filling depending on the pattern of transmitral flow velocity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsukamoto et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: