Why the study?
The cause-effect relationship between vitamin D deficiency and cardiometabolic abnormalities remains undefined, prompting investigation into its role in cardiac failure through myocardial insulin signaling.
Vitamin D deficiency independently induces cardiac dysfunction and metabolic syndrome-like features in rats, mediated at least in part by myocardial insulin resistance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support vitamin D supplementation in patients; leaves open translation of rat insulin-resistance mechanisms to human cardiomyopathy.
SCOPE: Cause-effect relationship between vitamin D deficiency and cardiometabolic abnormalities remains undefined. The aim is to investigate the role of vitamin D deficiency in cardiac failure, through possible involvement in myocardial insulin signaling. METHODS AND RESULTS: Male SD rats (n = 6) are fed a normal diet (Con), vitamin D-deficient diet [Con(-)], or high-fat, high fructose diet (HFHFrD) for 20 weeks. Cardiac hypertrophy and fetal gene program are confirmed in Con(-) group. Cardiac dysfunction is assessed by echocardiography. Elevated renin, TGF-β and collagen-1α mRNAs, p-ERK1/2, and perivascular fibrosis indicate cardiac remodeling in Con(-) group. Increased serum insulin, triglycerides, and blood pressure, and decreased glucose tolerance and HDL cholesterol are observed in Con(-) rats. Decreased p-Akt/Akt, GLUT4, SOD2, and catalase, and increased NF-κB, TNF-α, and IL-6 are observed in Con(-) hearts. In H9c2 cells, calcitriol attenuates palmitate-induced insulin resistance. VDR-silenced H9c2 cells show reduced Akt phosphorylation, GLUT4 translocation, and 2-NBDG uptake. Findings in Con(-) and HFHFrD groups are comparable. CONCLUSION: Vitamin D deficiency in rats mimic high-fat-, high-fructose-induced metabolic syndrome and cardiac dysfunction. This study demonstrates that vitamin D deficiency is an independent risk factor for heart failure, at least in part, through induction of myocardial insulin resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nizami et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: