Why the study?
Does pulmonary arterial hypertension affect right ventricular function and outcome after mitral valve replacement in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis?
Does pulmonary arterial hypertension affect right ventricular function and outcome after mitral valve replacement in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis?
Tricuspid valve annular shortening of <11% is a significant predictor of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing mitral valve replacement for rheumatic mitral stenosis, regardless of baseline pulmonary hypertension.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tricuspid annular shortening <11% was associated with adverse outcomes after mitral valve replacement; hypothesis-generating for RV assessment in rheumatic mitral stenosis.
Right ventricular function affects the outcome in valvular heart disease but less is known about the relation between indices of dysfunction and outcome. Seventy patients undergoing mitral valve replacement between April 2007 and April 2008 for predominant rheumatic mitral stenosis were included in the study. Two groups were formed based on right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), <or=40 mmHg (group I, n=16) and >41 mmHg (group II, n=54). Right ventricle (RV) function indices were studied by echocardiography. RVSP reduced significantly in group II (P=0.0001) but not in group I. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) was raised in all cases and reduced significantly postoperatively. Tricuspid annular plane excursion, myocardial performance index, RV descent and tricuspid valve annular shortening (TV shortening) conformed to RV dysfunction in both groups, and did not change significantly postoperatively. Regression analysis for outcome revealed TV shortening as the only significant factor (P=0.03). Receiver operating characteristic of TV shortening and adverse outcome showed worse outcome with TV shortening of <11%. RV dysfunction was observed in all cases irrespective of RVSP. TV shortening of <11% was associated with adverse outcome. Postoperative fall in BNP levels may indicate a trend towards recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pande et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: