Why the study?
Does intranasal administration of AAV vectors result in efficient gene transfer to the lung and systemic delivery of therapeutic proteins in mice?
Does intranasal administration of AAV vectors result in efficient gene transfer to the lung and systemic delivery of therapeutic proteins in mice?
Intranasal delivery of AAV5 vectors enables efficient gene transfer to the lung and sustained systemic secretion of therapeutic proteins in a preclinical model.
Supports intranasal AAV5 for sustained systemic protein delivery in mice; leaves open translation to human lung gene therapy.
This study evaluates the use of vectors based on adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) to noninvasively deliver genes to airway epithelial cells as a means for achieving systemic administration of therapeutic proteins. We intranasally delivered AAV vectors to mice in which the same AAV2 genome encoding a cellular marker was packaged in capsids from AAV1, 2, or 5 (AAV2/1, AAV2/2, or AAV2/5, respectively). Gene expression levels achieved in both airways and alveoli were higher with AAV2/5 than with AAV2/1 and were undetectable with AAV2/2. The same set of vectors encoding a secreted therapeutic protein, erythropoietin (Epo), under the control of a lung-specific promoter (CC10) was intranasally delivered to mice, resulting in polycythemia with the highest levels of serum Epo obtained with AAV2/5 vectors. After a single intranasal administration of this vector, secretion of Epo was documented for 150 days. Similarly, intranasal administration of an AAV2/5–CC10–factor IX vector resulted in secretion of functional recombinant protein in the bloodstream of hemophiliac, factor IX-deficient mice. In addition, we demonstrate successful readministration of AAV2/5 to the lung 5 months after the first delivery of the same vector. In conclusion, we show that intranasal administration of AAV vectors results in efficient gene transfer to the lung only when the vector contains the AAV5 capsid and that this noninvasive route of administration results in sustained secretion of therapeutic proteins in the bloodstream.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Auricchio et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: